In this day
and age, mergers and acquisitions play an important role in corporate finance.
For many companies, mergers and acquisitions are a source of external growth
when primary growth is not possible, whereas to other companies they represent
a constant threat to their continuing independent existence. Merge can be
explained as a friendly negotiated deals between 2 organization into a new
organization while acquisition means that a takeover of one company’s ordinary
share capital by another company, financed by cash or issue shares. Why mergers
and acquisition will occur in the financial world? It is because of synergy
which the executives believe that the combined organization will have a greater
value than the sum of its parts.
Here is the
formula for synergy:
PVAB
= PVA + PVB + Gains
Today I
will talk about the largest merger between Chrysler, a car industry from
America and Daimler, another car industry from Germany which is happened in
1998. Chrysler is one of the car industries that have the 3rd ranking
in the United States car-maker. Besides, it is known for “block-buster”
products because their best-selling vehicles are Minivan and Chrysler Jeep
Grand Cherokee. Chrysler are risk takers in term of design, finance and
manufacturing, it is quick and nimble where it can produce 2.2 million cars per
year. Meanwhile, Daimler- Benz is a car
industry that produce high-end car in Germany which was very different from
Chrysler. It has a strong historic roots and powerful heritage in the market.
Daimler- Benz is a complex company structure with a holding company, a much
diversified group including train; airline and car production and they are all
run as autonomous business units which each have its own chairman and
management board. Mercedes is one of the famous and profitable products around
the world. Can this two large company that have big different succeed in the merging
process? Well, not everyone will agree with merge and acquisition because they
will afraid of losing their jobs and takeover by the stronger company. In this
case, Daimler Benz is the powerhouse behind of the merger negotiation. Indeed,
the board member of Chrysler will definitely worry about this merger process
because it sounds like an acquisition instead of merge.
However, the merge between these two companies
was announced in 7 May 1998. In my point of view, I would say this merger as a
vertical merger because the combination of two companies operates at different
stages of production within same industry. It is because Jurgen Schrempp, CEO
of Daimler Benz said no to platform sharing because this would be a merger
without dilution of brands. After the merge, Daimler Chrysler started to face
problems because there was confusion between merger management and operational
management. Daimler Chrysler is excluded from the Standard & Poor 500
because the head-quartered is located in Germany. In this case, would Daimler
Chrysler be a German company or American company? What about the conflicts of
taxation and national pride for this company? Eventually, Daimler Chrysler did
not perform well in the market where it did not make any profit for their first
year and the new productions of Minivan from Chrysler were remaining unsold. At
this point, Schrempp started to lose confident with Chrysler because he
realized that Chrysler was losing control in the U.S market and the German
management made a mistake of not taking this problem serious in the early time.
However, Schremmp decided to take a drastic action by restructuring, downsizing
and refocusing on Daimler Chrysler.
After all,
I personally think that merger and acquisition between two companies may help
them to expand their value of the organization. However, there are also a lot
of limitations like culture, communication between employees, senior management
were inaccessible that will cause the failure of M&A. Please drop some
comment and tell me what you all think about merge and acquisition.
Cheers
Good beginning before assignment!
ReplyDeletedo you think the benefits of mergers and acquisition can offset the negative effect?
ReplyDeletedo you think if a firm maintain good reputation, it will attract more investors to invest in that firm?
ReplyDeleteDoes all M&A activity benefits from the synergies?
ReplyDeleteI personally think that synergies will benefits both companies as it sum up 2 company's value. Hence, it expand the company's value
ReplyDeleteHi vin, i dont think all M&A can offset negative effect as if the target company is in poor situation. it might affect the acquirer company
ReplyDelete